Abstract
The authors used an alternating treatments design to compare the effects of a worksheet condition and an ¡Pad condition on math fluency and active academic engagement during a high school math class in an alternative school setting. Following group instruction, the three participants engaged in independent seatwork either by completing problems on a worksheet or completing problems presented on an ¡Pad. Based on visual analyses, students solved more math problems correctly in less time and demonstrated higher levels of active engagement in the ¡Pad condition as compared to the worksheet condition. Social validity assessments indicated that the teacher and three students preferred the ¡Pad condition to the worksheet condition during the math lessons. A discussion on study limitations, implications, and future research directions is included.