Dynamic tilt Bigger energy reduction than dynamic horizontal Dynamic tilt energy reduction: 7.9% Steady tilt Best results: 8.9% reduction in heating/cooling requirements Steady tilt shading blocks useful light during the whole year Blocks the view from the inside Not an option from an architectural perspective (visual impact on thebuilding) Studied for academic purposes Supplementary investigation Integration of lighting control in combination with dynamictilt Bigger reduction in cooling requirements (lights increase temperature inside a building) Alternative shading schemes should be investigated (for morebeneficial results) 19 Dynamic shading conclusions