Benefits and harms of planned hospital birth compared with planned home birth for low-risk pregnant women
Most pregnancies among healthy women are normal, and most births could take place without unnecessary medical intervention.
However, it is not possible to predict with certainty that absolutely no complications will occur in the course of a birth. Thus, in many
countries it is believed that the safest option for all women is to give birth at hospital. In a few countries it is believed that as long as
the woman is followed during pregnancy and assisted by a midwife during birth, transfer between home and hospital, if needed, is
uncomplicated. In these countries home birth is an integrated part ofmaternity care. It seems increasingly clear that impatience and easy
access to many medical procedures at hospital may lead to increased levels of intervention which in turn may lead to new interventions
and finally to unnecessary complications. In a planned home birth assisted by an experienced midwife with collaborative medical back
up in case transfer should be necessary these drawbacks are avoided while the benefit of access to medical intervention when needed
is maintained. Increasingly better observational studies suggest that planned hospital birth is not any safer than planned home birth
assisted by an experienced midwife with collaborative medical back up, but may lead to more interventions and more complications.
However, there is no strong evidence from randomised trials to favour either planned hospital birth or planned home birth for low-risk
pregnant women. Only two very small randomised trials have been performed. Only one trial (involving 11 women) contributed data
to the review. They did not allow conclusions to be drawn except that women living in areas where they are not well informed about