Citizens and foreigners in other zones are regulated with a lighter hand, especially members of dominant groups, who are given special treatment because of their race or ethnicity. Instead of being disciplined, they are treated to a pastoral mode of care that Foucault calls “individualizing power” directed at particular objects of government. Pastoral techniques stress nurturing and special care that ensure the salvation of “the flock” while also attending to individual needs of survival and competition. In Asian states, preexisting ethnoracializing schemes (installed under colonial rule) are reinforced and crosscut by new ways of governing that differentially value populations according to market calculations. Thus, while low-skilled workers are disciplined, elite workers and members of dominant ethnic groups enjoy affirmative action and pastoral care. Such differential biopolitical investments in different subject populations privilege one ethnicity over another, male over female, and professional work over manual labor, within a transnationalized framework. The mix of market calculations and ethnic governmentality means that varied populations are subjected to different technologies of disciplining, regulation, and pastoral care, and in the process assigned different social fates. Let me examine the repatterning of postdevelopmental geographies and differentiated citizenship in Malaysia and Indonesia.