Cultural Diversity and Diversity: Culturing Delights of Our Days
1
Porntip Kanjananiyot, (Ms.)
Executive Director,
Thailand-United States Educational Foundation (TUSEF)
ptk@fulbrightthai.org
Abstract
The complicated and ever increasingly mobile world leads a louder call for
global competence, encompassing understanding of diversity as part of
effective intercultural communication in addition to technical and
professional capabilities.
While it would seem that many countries could be ‘patterned’ with
western influences dominating all the cultures, greater emphasis has been
placed on retention of national identity and cultural heritage. Examples of
efforts being made in Thai higher education and Fulbright Thailand will be
provided.
The author will also discuss a broader meaning of ‘diversity’, defined by
Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award of the U.S. Increased
understanding of cultural diversity could not only be a solid base to move
onto another stage of intellectual exchanges. Academics will stand proud
of their nations with heightened abilities to bring the best out of the
environments surrounded by people from diverse backgrounds, leading to
a more creativity and innovation-driven community, a crucial component
of universities of today and tomorrow.
Attempts will be made to suggest what the education circle should do for
enhanced abilities of Thai faculty and students to see the world from other
people’s perspectives. The proposed actions include ‘flexystem’ of
exchanges of staff and students, ‘fun’ knowledge management, and
‘frame-free’ thinking.
From Cave to Condo!
Imagine they coexisted, what would make a caveman differ from a condo-man?
Countless answers, aren’t there?
Appearances, behaviors, food, thinking, languages, etc.
Then, would you think of it the other way round? Would there be at least some
commonalities?
Indeed there would!
1 Paper presented at the EDU-COM 2006 Engagement and Empowerment: New Opportunities for
Growth in Higher Education on November 24, 2006 at Khon Kaen University, Nong Khai, Thailand
2
As a human being, the caveman definitely was blessed with abilities to imagine, to
reason, and to adjust themselves for survival and safety of his own self and group.
He would have lots to share with the condo-man, his local wisdom about the nature,
and practical tips of his survival skills.
At the same time, after some adjustments, he may decide to adopt/adapt concrete
technical and technological skills from the condo-man.
The key issue I wish to address here is that no matter how different one is from
another, there is no need to give up what he/she is. Both need to learn to appreciate
their own uniqueness, share it with others, learn to understand others and the world,
and then select to integrate some favorable aspects to their respective communities.
This is what I consider ‘Delights of our Days from Diversity’.
May I now move on to discuss ‘why’ and ‘how’!
Is Cultural Diversity ‘THAT IMPORTANT’?
The increasing ethnic, racial, cultural, religious, and language diversity in countries
worldwide is forcing educators and policymakers to rethink of their current notions of
citizenship and nationality. In addition, the heightened importance the world has
given to democracy has been influential to nations to take necessary actions to
ensure democratic values like justice and equality, with proper support to diverse
groups.
Could we blame it on the West or to be specific, the United States?
Eastern people like us could easily blame the West for its influences over our
cultures. The United States, for example, seems to ‘rule the world’, from Hollywood
movies and fast food to trade and investment. As Richard Pells (2006) pointed out,
academics, journalists, and political activists tend to regard global culture and
American culture as synonymous. Interestingly, he emphasized that the United
States ‘has been a recipient as much as an exporter of global culture…American
culture has spread throughout the world because it has incorporated foreign styles
and ideas...The effectiveness of English as a language of mass communications has
been essential to the acceptance of American culture.’
From my point of view, Pells’ reason is sound. After all, the United States has been
known as a country of ‘melting pot’. As stated in Wikipedia (2006), ‘melting pot’
refers to the mixing of ingredients in a pot that yields a final product with more
uniform consistency and flavor. The term is a metaphor that implies both a melting
of cultures and intermarriage of ethnicities. The country has welcomed people from
diverse backgrounds and nationalities while the locals have eventually tuned into
new cultures, becoming a blended American culture.
This very dimension needs to be taken into consideration, when discussing
domination of American culture over those of other countries, and to draw lessons of
how cultures could not only well be assimilated, but also have marketing potentials
to ‘sell’ to the world, enabling