Dear Ms. Piriyaporn :
Thanks for your efforts and information of Crown test in Thailand.
Our KU-4040 was made and using for end-users`s practical requirement.
If we supply 100%, it`ll be very difficult to use to spray. The harderner 100% is unavailable.
---------------------------------------------------------------
We`d like to express our opinion on your letter as follows:
1.You solved the problem of Blush, Blister to use KCC`s hardener B in Crown.
If the harderner changed without exact investigation, Crown don`t confidence Hardener KU-4040.
2. Would you explain KCC`s harderner test result by substitution of KU-4040?
The harderner is very important which is influnce the lacquer performance.
we think it is very dangerous trial test without our technical department`s permit.
3. KC-5400UV/ KU-4040 was designed suitable to SLAC line and are selling well in Korea and China.
We think the Crown`s problem is by the Crown worker`s carelessness.
If it`s true KU-4040 have problem, we have to discuss the substition of the KU-4040.
In order to clear the above issue, we`d like to request as follows:
(1) A sample despatch of KU-4040 (0.8kg) which you supplied to Crown.
(2) KCC`s Harderner sample with specifications.
(KCC`s Lab test result before Crown test. Raw material`s name.Manufactuer.Composition,FDA approval)
(3) Our competitor`s product sample request
-----------------------------------------
UBIS, AKZO`s Repair lacquer /Harderner/ Thinner
We`d like to proceed after studying the above 3 kinds of information with sample.
Your prompt cooperation will be highly appreciated.
Next Tuesday, we`ll send the sample of 24 cans as advised to you.
Thanks & best regards K.T.KIM
Dear Ms. Piriyaporn :
Thanks for your efforts and information of Crown test in Thailand.
Our KU-4040 was made and using for end-users`s practical requirement.
If we supply 100%, it`ll be very difficult to use to spray. The harderner 100% is unavailable.
---------------------------------------------------------------
We`d like to express our opinion on your letter as follows:
1.You solved the problem of Blush, Blister to use KCC`s hardener B in Crown.
If the harderner changed without exact investigation, Crown don`t confidence Hardener KU-4040.
2. Would you explain KCC`s harderner test result by substitution of KU-4040?
The harderner is very important which is influnce the lacquer performance.
we think it is very dangerous trial test without our technical department`s permit.
3. KC-5400UV/ KU-4040 was designed suitable to SLAC line and are selling well in Korea and China.
We think the Crown`s problem is by the Crown worker`s carelessness.
If it`s true KU-4040 have problem, we have to discuss the substition of the KU-4040.
In order to clear the above issue, we`d like to request as follows:
(1) A sample despatch of KU-4040 (0.8kg) which you supplied to Crown.
(2) KCC`s Harderner sample with specifications.
(KCC`s Lab test result before Crown test. Raw material`s name.Manufactuer.Composition,FDA approval)
(3) Our competitor`s product sample request
-----------------------------------------
UBIS, AKZO`s Repair lacquer /Harderner/ Thinner
We`d like to proceed after studying the above 3 kinds of information with sample.
Your prompt cooperation will be highly appreciated.
Next Tuesday, we`ll send the sample of 24 cans as advised to you.
Thanks & best regards K.T.KIM
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
