groups (lmer, 22
=
12.61, P = 0.002**), with a significant interaction
between group and habitat type (22
=
16.58, P < 0.001***).
Fig. 2b and d shows that species accumulation rates and
Simpson alpha-diversity were higher within the gardens than
outside. Shannon alpha-diversity showed a different pattern; diversity
was initially higher within the gardens but dropped with
the number of sites sampled, finally ending up with the lower
diversity.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling showed that the communities
within the gardens and outside overlapped along their
two main axes (Fig. 3b) and there was no significant difference
between the axis-1 coordinates of the two groups (Wilcoxon:
V = 38, P = 0.968).
groups (lmer, 22
=
12.61, P = 0.002**), with a significant interaction
between group and habitat type (22
=
16.58, P < 0.001***).
Fig. 2b and d shows that species accumulation rates and
Simpson alpha-diversity were higher within the gardens than
outside. Shannon alpha-diversity showed a different pattern; diversity
was initially higher within the gardens but dropped with
the number of sites sampled, finally ending up with the lower
diversity.
Non-metric multidimensional scaling showed that the communities
within the gardens and outside overlapped along their
two main axes (Fig. 3b) and there was no significant difference
between the axis-1 coordinates of the two groups (Wilcoxon:
V = 38, P = 0.968).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
