Fruitful HRD–management exchange resulted in HRD practitioners
strengthening their understanding of business-line priorities, and as outlined
by Boselie and Paauwe (2009), their strategic alignment to one another. An
observable outcome reflective of HRD alignment with management is the
demonstrated capacity of HRD practitioners to engage in substantive conversation
with managers about specific business-line matters using business-line
terminology (Alagaraja & Egan, 2010). In the best examples, HRD professionals
used operations terminology, could articulate aspects of key operations
processes, and credibly demonstrated capacity to connect the daily concerns
of business-line employees to learning and performance improvement–related
solutions. Conversely, management professionals may exhibit alignment with
HRD by articulating specific HRD-related issues, identifying specific learning
and performance improvement needs, demonstrating support for HRD initiatives,
and transferring and adapting learning and performance solutions gained
from HRD-related efforts. In addition, successful management development
efforts that are a by-product of aligned HRD-management efforts would ideally
be reflected in manager behaviors toward employees. Such behaviors should
include managers’ viewing their roles as including the facilitation of employee
learning and development. It is important to note that these issues extend
beyond the private sector to government and nongovernmental organizations—
including larger scale HRD efforts such as community and national HRD.
Refining such alignment is critical across organizations.
Fruitful HRD–management exchange resulted in HRD practitionersstrengthening their understanding of business-line priorities, and as outlinedby Boselie and Paauwe (2009), their strategic alignment to one another. Anobservable outcome reflective of HRD alignment with management is thedemonstrated capacity of HRD practitioners to engage in substantive conversationwith managers about specific business-line matters using business-lineterminology (Alagaraja & Egan, 2010). In the best examples, HRD professionalsused operations terminology, could articulate aspects of key operationsprocesses, and credibly demonstrated capacity to connect the daily concernsof business-line employees to learning and performance improvement–relatedsolutions. Conversely, management professionals may exhibit alignment withHRD by articulating specific HRD-related issues, identifying specific learningand performance improvement needs, demonstrating support for HRD initiatives,and transferring and adapting learning and performance solutions gainedfrom HRD-related efforts. In addition, successful management developmentefforts that are a by-product of aligned HRD-management efforts would ideallybe reflected in manager behaviors toward employees. Such behaviors shouldinclude managers’ viewing their roles as including the facilitation of employeelearning and development. It is important to note that these issues extendbeyond the private sector to government and nongovernmental organizations—including larger scale HRD efforts such as community and national HRD.Refining such alignment is critical across organizations.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
