The participants’ attitudinal evaluation of each item of the four aspects of the Bos Park was then examined (Table 4). The results showed that participants highly agreed with two items of the development strategy. They supported the idea of giving priority to the ecological considerations of urban parks, and ensuring recreational use while not causing a negative ecological impact. Regarding the design approach, participants highly consented to four items: the need of an almost 10-year long process for vegetation becoming mature and landscape reaching a stable condition, reducing the use of hard paving, park facilities and structures blending into the natural environment, and segmenting recreational areas from habitats of birds, animals, and plants. However, they quite strongly agreed to the other three items: limiting the number of recreational facilities, full use of native plants and avoiding use of annual plants, and planting seedlings at the beginning which takes years to become dense woods. As to the managerial operation, participants highly consented to two items: forbidding visitors to enter certain areas during the breeding season of birds and other animals, and avoiding the taking place of recreational activities that are destructive to plants and disturb birds and other animals. They just moderately agreed with three items: reducing human control of plant growth in order to display a natural landscape, making good use of natural water for irrigation, and the use of decayed foliage as fertilizer. The participants’ agreement to two items of the financial demand was moderate. They restrainedly supported the ideas that for parks with self-sustained natural forests, the management costs are much higher in the early years but decrease significantly afterwards, along with a decrease in human intervention and the work force required for park management.