In our analysis, increased bioelectricity production at the national-level can be achieved from the forest and agriculture sectors with relatively modest implications for GHG flux, land use change, and commodity prices. Energy crops are projected be the primary biomass feedstock. To the extent that perennial energy crops like switchgrass replace traditional agriculture crops, those energy crops may provide environmental co-benefits. Such environment benefits may generate some support from conservation groups for bioelectricity production. However, increased deforestation to meet bioelectricity may somewhat offset any support created from taking marginal cropland out of traditional production to plant switchgrass.