The levels of overlapping end-uses are currently relatively low if end-uses are defined as
narrowly as suggested by Korea. However, even within such overly-narrow end-use categories, the
evidence must be viewed in light of the relatively recent introduction of the western-style beverages to
the market. Furthermore, we do not agree with Korea's argument about the distinctness of current
market differentiation. We think Korea has drawn too fine a distinction between products for
purposes of Article III:2, second sentence. Again we recall the examples of substitutable products