Broadening the meaning of welfare into these areas, which, in many ways,
is in line with the social indicator movement (Allardt 1975; Allardt 2003; OECD
2007), makes the concept of welfare clearer. However, is also opens up a plethora
of difficulties in the evaluation of what welfare is, for example, by employing
different types of measurement such as the UNDP’s Human Development
Index (UNDP 2008). Blurring the boundaries between what welfare is also has
implications for the state’s role and what is expected to be a public and what a private responsibility. In classical economics, welfare, however, relies on individuals’
utility and, thereby, limits the state’s role, especially to dealing with
market failure (Barr 2003).
Broadening the meaning of welfare into these areas, which, in many ways,is in line with the social indicator movement (Allardt 1975; Allardt 2003; OECD2007), makes the concept of welfare clearer. However, is also opens up a plethoraof difficulties in the evaluation of what welfare is, for example, by employingdifferent types of measurement such as the UNDP’s Human DevelopmentIndex (UNDP 2008). Blurring the boundaries between what welfare is also hasimplications for the state’s role and what is expected to be a public and what a private responsibility. In classical economics, welfare, however, relies on individuals’utility and, thereby, limits the state’s role, especially to dealing withmarket failure (Barr 2003).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
