. Composition of effluents
Type of diet had a significant influence (P < 0.05) on faecal DM concentration of OM, CP, aNDFom, acid detergent fibre
(ADFom), ADL, HEM and CEL (Table 5). The diet based on SB led to a higher faecal content of CP and lower ADL than the
SFM diet, with the WDDGS-based diet giving intermediate values. The proportion of fibrous constituents on aNDFom varied
accordingly with type of diet, with HEM being highestfor the WDDGS (0.618), and those of CEL and ADL for the SB (0.371) and
SFM (0.171) diets, respectively. No significant effects of protein source were found on EE, NDICP, and SF faecal concentrations
that averaged 79.8, 28.0 and 52.9 g/kg DM. Source of protein did not affect urine DM concentration. However, the SB-based
diet led to a lower N urine contents and to a higher urine pH than the SFM-based diet.
. Composition of effluentsType of diet had a significant influence (P < 0.05) on faecal DM concentration of OM, CP, aNDFom, acid detergent fibre(ADFom), ADL, HEM and CEL (Table 5). The diet based on SB led to a higher faecal content of CP and lower ADL than theSFM diet, with the WDDGS-based diet giving intermediate values. The proportion of fibrous constituents on aNDFom variedaccordingly with type of diet, with HEM being highestfor the WDDGS (0.618), and those of CEL and ADL for the SB (0.371) andSFM (0.171) diets, respectively. No significant effects of protein source were found on EE, NDICP, and SF faecal concentrationsthat averaged 79.8, 28.0 and 52.9 g/kg DM. Source of protein did not affect urine DM concentration. However, the SB-baseddiet led to a lower N urine contents and to a higher urine pH than the SFM-based diet.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..