Compares in detail two impact analysis reports done on Massachusetts film production incentives
(FPIs) for the year 2011 to understand the different evaluation variables used by evaluators (key government
agencies, industry stakeholders, and third parties) to analyze the impact of the FPIs on the state economy, job
creation, etc. To understand the discrepancy in reports, this paper examines the origin and proliferation of FPIs
in the light of two most important types of policy convergences namely convergence through emulation and
convergence through penetration. This study, then compares nine impact analysis reports starting from 2002 to
2013 to list down variables used in the analysis. This study concludes with the author's adjustments to the
impact analysis reports by HR&A; and Department of Revenue on Massachusetts FPIs using common
variables.
Compares in detail two impact analysis reports done on Massachusetts film production incentives(FPIs) for the year 2011 to understand the different evaluation variables used by evaluators (key governmentagencies, industry stakeholders, and third parties) to analyze the impact of the FPIs on the state economy, jobcreation, etc. To understand the discrepancy in reports, this paper examines the origin and proliferation of FPIsin the light of two most important types of policy convergences namely convergence through emulation andconvergence through penetration. This study, then compares nine impact analysis reports starting from 2002 to2013 to list down variables used in the analysis. This study concludes with the author's adjustments to theimpact analysis reports by HR&A; and Department of Revenue on Massachusetts FPIs using commonvariables.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..