al., (1995) in Camelo and Gomez (2004)). The result of this study was in agreement of the studies above because
tomatoes observed in ripening stage. The a*/b* parameter of no water stress and water stress tomato showed almost
similar value and increased trend during storage with all temperatures (Fig. 2).
Chroma (C*) value of water stress tomato was higher than no water stress tomato. For no water stress tomato,
slight increase of C* occurred during first 4 days of storage and after that decreased until the end of storage. For
water stress tomato stored with 30 °C increased the C* during first 4 days and decreased until the end of storage.
Hue (h) values of water stress and no water stress tomato were mostly similar and the trend were not different for all
temperature and storage time. Significant decreased occurred during first 4 days and then showed stable or slightly
changes. Although the trends were similar, the 3D surface of both chroma (C*) and hue (h) were different (see Fig.
3). An analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) showed insignificant different of color quality both water stress and
no water stress tomato with temperatures as independent variable of this study.