In my opinion reducing the size of the photograph does not actually transform it. I do not agree with Judge Taylor’s argument described in the case. Even a thumbnail sized image of the original image is actually a miniature copy of the original image. Photography is an art in its self, a picture captures the view of the world that a professional artist wants it to capture. It shows the world through the photographer’s point of view and therefore uses the artist’s creative potential. Therefore, even if it is reduced in size it in essence shows the same view point of the artist and should be classified as the intellectual property of the artist.