The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of student guiding materials on student achievement, using the 5E
learning model. The materials were developed by the researcher, based on the “Movement and Force” unit’s objectives. Quasiexperimental
research design included 60 students (30 experimental, 30 control group). Control group students were given
experiment booklets, which were prepared for each experiment in accordance with the 5E learning model. To determine whether
any differences exist between the two groups’ academic achievements, Achievement Tests on Movement and Force Issues were
applied to the groups, both at the beginning and at the end of the semester as pre- and post-tests. Pre- and post-test results were
compared, using a t-test in SPSS packet program. Results showed a meaningful difference between groups in favor of the
experimental group (t58=5.06; p=.00 < .05).
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of student guiding materials on student achievement, using the 5Elearning model. The materials were developed by the researcher, based on the “Movement and Force” unit’s objectives. Quasiexperimentalresearch design included 60 students (30 experimental, 30 control group). Control group students were givenexperiment booklets, which were prepared for each experiment in accordance with the 5E learning model. To determine whetherany differences exist between the two groups’ academic achievements, Achievement Tests on Movement and Force Issues wereapplied to the groups, both at the beginning and at the end of the semester as pre- and post-tests. Pre- and post-test results werecompared, using a t-test in SPSS packet program. Results showed a meaningful difference between groups in favor of theexperimental group (t58=5.06; p=.00 < .05).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
