I understand that you can not accept this claim, but what I try to explain to you is that .
1. Since we have shifted transition from the JUMP system to the CMMS system, we need to group all parts of the old system. Without not reference the invoice.
2. We use parts according to the confirmation system and the parts is called into use in conjunction with the parts new order.
3. We can not be sure that the parts of any invoice remaining. Until we are use the parts of our system migration runs out.
there is why we find abnormalities in the timing differences for claims 8D15017WS are acceptable. The claim was denied, according to the agreed time schedule too demanding , but why we call 8D report from a vendor that. To prevent crashes and over again and I understood that this claim is not a problem because of claims that were previously on.