ield directly in terms of the physico-chemical nature
of the carbon source. For aerobic growth, Roels [33]
proposed a correlation between the biomass yield
and the reduction degree of the substrate. More recently,
Heijnen et al. [14] developed another correlation
scheme, which is based on the hypothesis that
the Gibbs energy dissipation per unit of biomass
formed is fundamentally determined by the physico-
chemical nature of the carbon source and independent
of the electron acceptor involved. Calculations
based on literature data, covering a wide range
of growth substrates and energy metabolism, have
shown that within an uncertainty range of 30%, the
Gibbs energy dissipation vrG0
X can be correlated with
the carbon-chain length (C) and the degree of reduction
(QD) of the electron donor.
ield directly in terms of the physico-chemical nature
of the carbon source. For aerobic growth, Roels [33]
proposed a correlation between the biomass yield
and the reduction degree of the substrate. More recently,
Heijnen et al. [14] developed another correlation
scheme, which is based on the hypothesis that
the Gibbs energy dissipation per unit of biomass
formed is fundamentally determined by the physico-
chemical nature of the carbon source and independent
of the electron acceptor involved. Calculations
based on literature data, covering a wide range
of growth substrates and energy metabolism, have
shown that within an uncertainty range of 30%, the
Gibbs energy dissipation vrG0
X can be correlated with
the carbon-chain length (C) and the degree of reduction
(QD) of the electron donor.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..