Example: (Continued)
Delegate Profile
The LM programme is designed to develop the personal leadership skills of those at director and
middle-senior management levels.
Delegates are grouped into teams of six to nine individuals from different organizations, facilitated by
course tutors and led by the overall course director.
It is interesting to observe the complexity of response to attendance on the programme when members return to their organization. For some, it is either the confirmation of ‘what they already knew’ – that the concept of leadership espoused by the programme (and endorsed by the organization) is entirely legitimate and one to
which they would wish to adhere. For others, the programme is the beginning of a journey of enlightenment as they attempt to relate the issues from the programme into their lives at work. For others, the programme is ‘interesting’ but not experienced as particularly relevant to their lives. In addition, there are those for whom the
programme is a form of indoctrination into a particular ‘way of being’ that is the opposite of their identity as a member of the organization. Paradoxically, for some members of the group, the stressful environment of the programme and the novelty of the situation may reinforce existing behaviours and attitudes rather than changing
them (Grant, 1996) – they re-enter their organization with an enhanced conviction that their way of ‘being a leader’ was the right way all along.
Example: (Continued)
Delegate Profile
The LM programme is designed to develop the personal leadership skills of those at director and
middle-senior management levels.
Delegates are grouped into teams of six to nine individuals from different organizations, facilitated by
course tutors and led by the overall course director.
It is interesting to observe the complexity of response to attendance on the programme when members return to their organization. For some, it is either the confirmation of ‘what they already knew’ – that the concept of leadership espoused by the programme (and endorsed by the organization) is entirely legitimate and one to
which they would wish to adhere. For others, the programme is the beginning of a journey of enlightenment as they attempt to relate the issues from the programme into their lives at work. For others, the programme is ‘interesting’ but not experienced as particularly relevant to their lives. In addition, there are those for whom the
programme is a form of indoctrination into a particular ‘way of being’ that is the opposite of their identity as a member of the organization. Paradoxically, for some members of the group, the stressful environment of the programme and the novelty of the situation may reinforce existing behaviours and attitudes rather than changing
them (Grant, 1996) – they re-enter their organization with an enhanced conviction that their way of ‘being a leader’ was the right way all along.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""