The results delineated in the measurement model were subjected
to testing and were found valid. Next, the structural model in the SEM
was performed and evaluated by examining fit indices and varianceexplained
estimates. A variety of indices were used to assess the model's
overall fit (see Table 5). The results indicated that the χ2 of the model
was 274.188 with 143 of freedom (χ2
/df = 1.917). The indices value
for comparative fit index (CFI), goodness of fit index (GFI), and normed
fit index (NFI) were above 0.90 and root mean square error of approximation
(RMSEA) below 0.08 (Bentler, 1990; Byrne, 2001), indicating a
satisfactory fit. Therefore, the hypothesized model was a good fit and
acceptable.
Table 6 and Fi
The results delineated in the measurement model were subjectedto testing and were found valid. Next, the structural model in the SEMwas performed and evaluated by examining fit indices and varianceexplainedestimates. A variety of indices were used to assess the model'soverall fit (see Table 5). The results indicated that the χ2 of the modelwas 274.188 with 143 of freedom (χ2/df = 1.917). The indices valuefor comparative fit index (CFI), goodness of fit index (GFI), and normedfit index (NFI) were above 0.90 and root mean square error of approximation(RMSEA) below 0.08 (Bentler, 1990; Byrne, 2001), indicating asatisfactory fit. Therefore, the hypothesized model was a good fit andacceptable.Table 6 and Fi
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
