You can have your treat now, if you want. But if you don't eat it until I come back from running an errand, you can have two then."
The room was sanitized of distractions: no toys, no books, not even a picture. Self-control was a major feat for a four-year-old un der such dire conditions. About a third grabbed the marshmallow on the spot, while another third or so waited the endless fifteen minutes until they were rewarded with two (the other third fell somewhere in the middle). Most significant: the ones who resisted the lure of the sweet had higher scores on measures of executive control, particularly the reallocation of attention.
How we focus holds the key to willpower, says Mischel. His hundreds of hours of observation of little kids fighting off temp tation reveal "the strategic allocation of attention," as he puts it, to be the crucial skill. The kids who waited out the full fifteen minutes did it by distracting themselves with tactics like pretend play, singing songs, or covering their eyes. If a kid just stared at the marshmallow, he was a goner (or more precisely, the marsh mallow was).
At least three sub-varieties of attention, all aspects of the ex ecutive, are at play when we pit self-restraint against instant grat ification. The first is the ability to voluntarily disengage our focus from an object of desire that powerfully grabs our attention. The second, resisting distraction, lets us keep our focus elsewhere say, on fantasy play-rather than gra':_itating back to that juicy whatever. And the third allows us to keep our focus on a goal. in the future, like the two marshmallows later. All that adds up to willpower.
Well and good for children who show self-control in a contrived situation like the marshmallow test. But what about resisting the temptations of real life? Enter the children of Dunedin, NewZealand.
You can have your treat now, if you want. But if you don't eat it until I come back from running an errand, you can have two then."
The room was sanitized of distractions: no toys, no books, not even a picture. Self-control was a major feat for a four-year-old un der such dire conditions. About a third grabbed the marshmallow on the spot, while another third or so waited the endless fifteen minutes until they were rewarded with two (the other third fell somewhere in the middle). Most significant: the ones who resisted the lure of the sweet had higher scores on measures of executive control, particularly the reallocation of attention.
How we focus holds the key to willpower, says Mischel. His hundreds of hours of observation of little kids fighting off temp tation reveal "the strategic allocation of attention," as he puts it, to be the crucial skill. The kids who waited out the full fifteen minutes did it by distracting themselves with tactics like pretend play, singing songs, or covering their eyes. If a kid just stared at the marshmallow, he was a goner (or more precisely, the marsh mallow was).
At least three sub-varieties of attention, all aspects of the ex ecutive, are at play when we pit self-restraint against instant grat ification. The first is the ability to voluntarily disengage our focus from an object of desire that powerfully grabs our attention. The second, resisting distraction, lets us keep our focus elsewhere say, on fantasy play-rather than gra':_itating back to that juicy whatever. And the third allows us to keep our focus on a goal. in the future, like the two marshmallows later. All that adds up to willpower.
Well and good for children who show self-control in a contrived situation like the marshmallow test. But what about resisting the temptations of real life? Enter the children of Dunedin, NewZealand.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
