The various sources of replacement of the animals and plants – bred or cultivated in
the private household or acquired, generate different costs, according to the approach based
on the historical cost. A considerably improved comparability and intelligibility appear when
the similar assets are evaluated and reported usingthe same basis.
In conclusion, if an entity has previously measureda biological asset at the fair value
less the estimated point-of-sale costs, it is necessary that the entity should continue measuring
the biological asset at the fair value from which the point-of-sale costs are deduced until the
moment of yielding. If the entity resorts to an exception from reliability, then it is necessary
for supplementary information which would include information concerning the biological
assets detained at the end of the period, such as adescription of the assets an
Sustaining the measurement based on the fair value must take into account that the
contracted transactions with the purpose to make biological transformations have often just a
slight connection with the biological transformation in itself and consequently, a more distant
connection with the anticipated future benefits. Nobenefit can be reported until the moment
of the first harvest and sale of the production obtained by a forest entity that uses an
accounting pattern of the historical cost that is based on the transaction.