The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) began to investigate and filed suitagainst Xerox in US District Court for the Southern District of New York.
1
The complaintalleged that Xerox, using a host of undisclosed accounting “actions,” which were often referredto as “accounting opportunities” and “one-offs,” distorted earnings and misled investors Therewere two basic manipulations that formed the basis for the SEC investigation. The first was theso-called “cookie jar” method. This involved improperly storing revenue off the balance sheetand then releasing the stored funds at strategic times in order to boost lagging earnings for a particular quarter. This is a widely used manipulation. The second method—and what accountedfor the larger part of the fraudulent earnings—was the acceleration of revenue from short-termequipment rentals, which were improperly classified as long-term leases. The difference wassignificant because according to the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)—thestandards by which a company’s books are supposed to be measured—the entire value of a long-term lease can be included as revenue in the first year of the agreement. The value of a rental, onthe other hand, is spread out over the duration of the contract.