We adopted the service quality instrument developed by Brady and Cronin (2001). In this study, three second-order factors (interaction quality, physical environment, and outcome quality) and service quality were used. Each of these variables was measured by two items. An example of interaction quality is “Overall, I’d say the quality of my interaction with this restaurant's employees is excellent”. An example of service environment quality is “I would say this restaurant's physical environment is one of the best in its industry”. An example of outcome quality is “I always have an excellent experience when I visit this restaurant”. An example of service quality is “I would say that this restaurant provides superior service”. All items were scored on a 7-point scale (1=strongly disagree; 7=strongly agree). The Cronbach's alphas for interaction quality, physical environment, outcome quality, and service quality were .76, .74, .81, and .82, respectively. Following Brady and Cronin (2001) and other researchers (Wanous et al., 1997), satisfaction was measured using a single-item. Demographic data, frequency of patronage, and customer satisfaction were also measured. The questionnaire was translated into Chinese and back translated by four bilingual researchers. The Chinese version was pilot-tested to assess the clarity and appropriateness of the items, and any ambiguous wording in the questionnaire was subsequently revised. The items were presented in random order in the questionnaire.