Another issue concerns institutions in the United States, Canada,
Australia, England, and elsewhere that are opening branch campuses.
According to Woodard (2002), this trend is prominent in the former-
Soviet block countries in Central and Eastern Europe. In the United
States, regional accreditation first included an international dimension
in 1965 when off-campus programmes in foreign countries were
included as part of the institution’s accreditation status (Geiger
1970). Lenn (2002) suggested that eight central questions be considered
by institutions when deciding to export degree programmes to
international locations. UNESCO and the intergovernmental
Council of Europe formed a working group on transnational
education and this group recently announced some principles of good practice, similar to those produced by regional accrediting bodies in
the United States in the late 80s and early 90s.
Another issue concerns institutions in the United States, Canada,Australia, England, and elsewhere that are opening branch campuses.According to Woodard (2002), this trend is prominent in the former-Soviet block countries in Central and Eastern Europe. In the UnitedStates, regional accreditation first included an international dimensionin 1965 when off-campus programmes in foreign countries wereincluded as part of the institution’s accreditation status (Geiger1970). Lenn (2002) suggested that eight central questions be consideredby institutions when deciding to export degree programmes tointernational locations. UNESCO and the intergovernmentalCouncil of Europe formed a working group on transnationaleducation and this group recently announced some principles of good practice, similar to those produced by regional accrediting bodies inthe United States in the late 80s and early 90s.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..