Discussion
Considering the approach in develop the system, found that the approach of collaborative action research was major
approach as a part of system, and an important mechanism for putting the outcomes into practice. Since the focus of related
persons’ participation especially the collaboration among teachers, the work would be successful. It was supported by
Stringer (1996) and Robinson (1994) statement that the larger the school size was, and the more different management
structures were, if every knowledgeable and skillful teacher collaborated in their work, the combination of thought as well as
extended boundary of research implementation would be broader. It could be stated that the collaborative action research
would be mechanism which could move for improvement and changes in measurement and evaluation process in learning
achievement of learning achievement in class in aligned with learning and teaching.
However, the system development in this study wasn’t used in school level. The findings from evaluate in quality
of obtained system was judge by the experts. Therefore, future research studies should try out the developed system in order
to know the results of practice as well as the experts’ additional recommendations that the Input, a major input of system in
overall, were remained the same. But, there should be supplementary consideration in school context as the impact
from modified structure in work management of the educational service area which separated the secondary
education from the former education service area. For the process, found that it should be remained the same. But,
the additional considerations should be performed when there was a movement into other school systems such as
teachers’ development system, it might be based on network of the educational service area, and the teachers from
school as major power for teacher development.
For the Outcome, the outcomes were not occurred only with students, teachers, and administrators, but also
might be occurred with the teachers who would be network regarding to the development in body of knowledge as
well as network expansion. For the Feedback, it was an important component of system since it would lead to
continuous development system, and adjustable in time with the potential changes. The outcomes of system
development and improvement were based on rationale of flexible system design in order to develop and improve
the system relevant to context of work unit truly.
Discussion
Considering the approach in develop the system, found that the approach of collaborative action research was major
approach as a part of system, and an important mechanism for putting the outcomes into practice. Since the focus of related
persons’ participation especially the collaboration among teachers, the work would be successful. It was supported by
Stringer (1996) and Robinson (1994) statement that the larger the school size was, and the more different management
structures were, if every knowledgeable and skillful teacher collaborated in their work, the combination of thought as well as
extended boundary of research implementation would be broader. It could be stated that the collaborative action research
would be mechanism which could move for improvement and changes in measurement and evaluation process in learning
achievement of learning achievement in class in aligned with learning and teaching.
However, the system development in this study wasn’t used in school level. The findings from evaluate in quality
of obtained system was judge by the experts. Therefore, future research studies should try out the developed system in order
to know the results of practice as well as the experts’ additional recommendations that the Input, a major input of system in
overall, were remained the same. But, there should be supplementary consideration in school context as the impact
from modified structure in work management of the educational service area which separated the secondary
education from the former education service area. For the process, found that it should be remained the same. But,
the additional considerations should be performed when there was a movement into other school systems such as
teachers’ development system, it might be based on network of the educational service area, and the teachers from
school as major power for teacher development.
For the Outcome, the outcomes were not occurred only with students, teachers, and administrators, but also
might be occurred with the teachers who would be network regarding to the development in body of knowledge as
well as network expansion. For the Feedback, it was an important component of system since it would lead to
continuous development system, and adjustable in time with the potential changes. The outcomes of system
development and improvement were based on rationale of flexible system design in order to develop and improve
the system relevant to context of work unit truly.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""