This was a small sample by RDS standards, and as such it is very likely that sample equilibrium had not been reached, and that sample skewing as a result of seed selection, volunteerism, and other peer-driven pitfalls affected the representativeness of the 132 recruits, and perhaps the 466 reports as well (the latter is equally important because the reports were used to estimate the space of variability of the ambient population in the second estimate as well).