The argument is formally valid, but whether it is sound or not (i.e. whether it is a reasonable argument) depends upon the truth of its premises, We can challenge the argument, argue that it is fallacious, by challenging the truth of its premises (Letcu, 2006). I want to specifically question the premises on the grounds that they (a) predicate the possible success of problematic identity category as subject (‘we’), and (b) falsely claim that the change attributed to the modern world is simply an inevitable fact of life which ‘we’ must accept. Both of these flaws in the premised can be associated with the mocro-strategy of depoliticization