The scholars and professionals of FAHP believed that among the main dimensions of HR consulting firms' performance assessment, "HR consulting firms' knowledge management" is most important, followed by "employees' professional skills," and "high level HR consultants' reputation," whereas "HR consulting firms' value assessment" is least important. The scholars and professionals of FAHP indicated that among the assessment indicators of the dimension of employees* professional skills, "familiarity with clients' industries" is most important, followed by "employees' average professional experience seniority," "hours of training per employee per year," and "percentage of employees with professional licenses," whereas "percentage of employees with bachelor's degree or higher" is least important. The experts of FAHP believed that among the assessment indicators of the dimension of HR consulting firms' knowledge management, "ability to utilize information technology" is most important, followed by "width of experience and skills," "ability to develop new business," and "efficiency of handling projects," whereas "speed of absorbing new knowledge" is least important. The experts of FAHP pointed out that among the assessment indicators of the dimension of high level HR consultants* reputation, "group leadership" is most important, followed by "communication/coordination skill," "number of new clients," and "number of previous clients kept," whereas "production value per client" is least important. The Scholars and professionals of FAHP indicated that among the assessment indicators of the dimension of value assessment among HR consultation firms' value assessment, "total annual production value" is most important, followed by "employees* additional values," "return rate of HR capital," and "employees* average net present value/average employee time," whereas "productivity per person (production value)" is least important.