But what I do not like very much. Is proven guilty by a justice of Thailand, originally called to investigate by torturing the accused is using physical torture suffering pain, such as hammering a nail to press one's temple, forcing the accused to confess. This is based on the idea that. Who was accused and arrested a person who was guilty and then used torture to obtain confessions or proven wrong by diving through fire. Such an approach makes those captured have suffered a lot. Such a way contrary to the law clearly modern. Because of the principles of modern law is treated the accused is innocent until proven guilty of all the evidence that is true. He will be punished No official analysis framework and coercion to make him confess.