We take the distinction between the two terms as crucial, as do Celce-Murcia et al.
(1996), Dalton and Seidlhofer (1994), and Underhill (1994); the latter two books are
clearly divided into two separate sections along these lines. Our discussion is divided
into three parts. Section 2 sets out a framework for the relationship between TELT
and SFLT, recognising the distinction. Section 3 reports our research related to this
theoretical framework, and derives implications from the research. Section 4 elabo-
rates pedagogic practice, and suggests dierences of priority for:
1. SFLT methodology involving pronunciation learning and practice; and
2. TELT courses involving the study and practice of pronunciation-teaching
methodology, underpinned by the study of phonology.