6.1. Effects on nutritional parameters
Table 1 shows the nutritional composition and energetic value.
When compared with previous works, despite being treated in
fresh form (Fernandes et al., 2013b; Heleno et al., 2011), the obtained
profiles presented lower amounts in fat, proteins and ash,
and as expected (since carbohydrates are calculated by difference),
higher amounts of carbohydrates. However, differences in macronutrients
(as those further highlighted in Sections 6.2 and 6.3)
might, in part, be explained by some specific factors, such as harvesting
year or geographical origin. Nevertheless, that is not a
critical factor, since the main objective was verifying the effect of
irradiation treatment and the sampling procedure followed in this
work certainly assures the homogeneity of the samples used in any
of the assayed conditions, thereby allowing to obtain some accurate
conclusions.
6.1. Effects on nutritional parametersTable 1 shows the nutritional composition and energetic value.When compared with previous works, despite being treated infresh form (Fernandes et al., 2013b; Heleno et al., 2011), the obtainedprofiles presented lower amounts in fat, proteins and ash,and as expected (since carbohydrates are calculated by difference),higher amounts of carbohydrates. However, differences in macronutrients(as those further highlighted in Sections 6.2 and 6.3)might, in part, be explained by some specific factors, such as harvestingyear or geographical origin. Nevertheless, that is not acritical factor, since the main objective was verifying the effect ofirradiation treatment and the sampling procedure followed in thiswork certainly assures the homogeneity of the samples used in anyof the assayed conditions, thereby allowing to obtain some accurateconclusions.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""