Nonetheless, there were
only significant changes in the CA but not in the SFA in the
present study. One explanation for this finding could be that
the mean SFA IMT of all subjects (348 lm, SD = 57 lm) was
already too low to detect further decrease adaptations, whereas
the mean CA IMT (432 lm, SD = 57 lm) still had some
‘buffer’ to further adapt downwards.