respectively. Again, a range of locations
were investigated but it is only when the upper limit of the
weaker layer reached approximately 2m below MSL that it began to influence
the cliff toe position. This influence continued until the upper limit was 2 m above MSL, again demonstrating the importance of the
anomalous layer position. In comparison to the effect of resistant layer
position,while the results show the same affected 4m range, the distribution with
respect to MSL varies (−1m and+3m relative toMSL for a
more resistant layer). This variation can be attributed to the contrasting
effect the anomalous layers have on shore profile geomorphology
which will be further discussed in Section 5.1