Timely communication of relevant evaluation findings to the client and right-to-know audiences is another key theme of this checklist. As needed, findings from the different evaluation components should be drawn together and reported periodically, typically once or twice a year. The general process, for each reporting occasion, calls for draft reports to be sent to designated stakeholders about 10 days prior to a feedback workshop.1 At the workshop the evaluators should use visual aids, e.g., a PowerPoint presentation to brief the client, staff, and other members of the audience. (It is often functional to provide the clients with a copy of the visual aids, so subsequently they can brief members of their boards or other stakeholder groups on the most recent evaluation findings.) Those present at the feedback workshop should be invited to raise questions, discuss the findings, and apply them as they choose. At the workshop’s end, the evaluators should summarize the evaluation’s planned next steps and future reports; arrange for needed assistance from the client group, especially in data collection; and inquire whether any changes in the data collection and reporting plans and schedule would make future evaluation services more credible and useful. Following the feedback workshop, the evaluators should finalize the evaluation reports, revise the evaluation plan and schedule as appropriate, and transmit to the client and other designated recipients the finalized reports and any revised evaluation plans and schedule.
Beyond guiding the evaluator’s work, the checklist gives advice for evaluation users. For each of the 10 evaluation components, the checklist provides checkpoints on the left for evaluators and checkpoints on the right for evaluation clients and other users.
For more information about the CIPP Model, please consult the references and related checklists listed at the end of this checklist.
CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist
Timely communication of relevant evaluation findings to the client and right-to-know audiences is another key theme of this checklist. As needed, findings from the different evaluation components should be drawn together and reported periodically, typically once or twice a year. The general process, for each reporting occasion, calls for draft reports to be sent to designated stakeholders about 10 days prior to a feedback workshop.1 At the workshop the evaluators should use visual aids, e.g., a PowerPoint presentation to brief the client, staff, and other members of the audience. (It is often functional to provide the clients with a copy of the visual aids, so subsequently they can brief members of their boards or other stakeholder groups on the most recent evaluation findings.) Those present at the feedback workshop should be invited to raise questions, discuss the findings, and apply them as they choose. At the workshop’s end, the evaluators should summarize the evaluation’s planned next steps and future reports; arrange for needed assistance from the client group, especially in data collection; and inquire whether any changes in the data collection and reporting plans and schedule would make future evaluation services more credible and useful. Following the feedback workshop, the evaluators should finalize the evaluation reports, revise the evaluation plan and schedule as appropriate, and transmit to the client and other designated recipients the finalized reports and any revised evaluation plans and schedule.นอกเหนือจากแนวทางการถ่วงดุลการทำงาน รายการตรวจสอบให้คำแนะนำสำหรับผู้ใช้ประเมิน สำหรับแต่ละส่วนประกอบประเมิน 10 รายการตรวจสอบมีจุดตรวจด้านซ้าย evaluators และจุดตรวจด้านขวาสำหรับประเมินลูกค้าและผู้ใช้อื่น ๆสำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมเกี่ยวกับรูปแบบจำลอง CIPP โปรดดูอ้างอิงและรายการตรวจสอบที่เกี่ยวข้องที่ระบุไว้ในตอนท้ายของรายการตรวจสอบนี้ตรวจสอบแบบจำลองการประเมิน CIPP
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
