Abstract
-
A study imitating a procedure of a Two
Stages Gear Box (2SGB) assembly line la
yout is presented. Three balancing
methods are studied in which 2SGB is asse
mbled. These methods are Rank position weight, larger candidate rate, and Column
method. The selection criterion was based on
minimum assembly time for a
ll method. Three assembly line
processing layouts were
developed based on output of assembly methods which are the sing
le straight line, circle and mixed (circle + straight) processi
ng. The
best layout was found to be the line stations layout by Ranked Po
sitional Weight Method with 4 st
ations and total assembly time
of
4.25 minutes per gearbox. Each station has
one worker, the service time of 1.1 minutes, line balancing efficiency was 0.964, an
d labor
efficiency was 0.8884.
Abstract-A study imitating a procedure of a Two Stages Gear Box (2SGB) assembly line layout is presented. Three balancing methods are studied in which 2SGB is assembled. These methods are Rank position weight, larger candidate rate, and Column method. The selection criterion was based on minimum assembly time for all method. Three assembly line processing layouts were developed based on output of assembly methods which are the single straight line, circle and mixed (circle + straight) processing. The best layout was found to be the line stations layout by Ranked Positional Weight Method with 4 stations and total assembly time of 4.25 minutes per gearbox. Each station has one worker, the service time of 1.1 minutes, line balancing efficiency was 0.964, and labor efficiency was 0.8884.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
