VI.1 Indonesia's claim regarding the calculation of the constructed normal values for Indah Kiat and Pindo Deli has two aspects. First, Indonesia argues that the KTC acted inconsistently with Articles 2.2 and 2.2.2 of the Agreement in the calculation of the constructed normal values for Indah Kiat and Pindo Deli. Indonesia's claim relates exclusively to the determination of the interest expenses for CMI, the selling company that was in charge of re-selling the subject product produced by Indah Kiat and Pindo Deli in the Indonesian market in the period of investigation. Indonesia does not challenge other aspects of the calculation of these normal values.