reported here. In short, no planned contrasts indicating either RS or
RE were found during the P50m time interval. During the early N1m
interval (Fig. 3, upper row), strong suppression from initial to late
repetitions occurred in a large area encompassing the precuneus,
bilaterally (cluster-PFWE b 0.001; k = 588). In temporal areas, a large
cluster showed a significant effect of suppression in the right rolandic
operculum, and regions of the right HG, and STG (cluster-PFWE =
0.001; k = 100). In the left hemisphere, maximal suppression with
repetitions occurred in the MTG (cluster-PFWE = 0.002; k = 89) and
the inferior temporal gyrus (cluster-PFWE = 0.009; k = 32). A clear RS
from middle to late repetitions was only observed bilaterally in the
precuneus (cluster-PFWE = 0.009; k = 89). Similarly, during the late
N1m interval only a cluster centered in the left precuneus showed
reported here. In short, no planned contrasts indicating either RS orRE were found during the P50m time interval. During the early N1minterval (Fig. 3, upper row), strong suppression from initial to laterepetitions occurred in a large area encompassing the precuneus,bilaterally (cluster-PFWE b 0.001; k = 588). In temporal areas, a largecluster showed a significant effect of suppression in the right rolandicoperculum, and regions of the right HG, and STG (cluster-PFWE =0.001; k = 100). In the left hemisphere, maximal suppression withrepetitions occurred in the MTG (cluster-PFWE = 0.002; k = 89) andthe inferior temporal gyrus (cluster-PFWE = 0.009; k = 32). A clear RSfrom middle to late repetitions was only observed bilaterally in theprecuneus (cluster-PFWE = 0.009; k = 89). Similarly, during the lateN1m interval only a cluster centered in the left precuneus showed
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
