Table 4 compares patients’ assessments of their outcomes
by group. The number of patients in the TTM group who
reported that their feelings of spasticity had decreased was
greater than those who reported the same in the PT group
(79.2% versus 52.4%; P=0.057). However, the functions
of their limbs improved only 37%–38% with no difference
between the groups (P=0.967). Concerning patient satisfac-
tion, 90.5% of the patients were satisfied with the PT pro-
gram compared with 75% of the massage patients. Again,
there was no significant difference between the two groups
(P=0.427). The number of adverse events that occurred dur-
ing the study did not differ between the groups (P=0.807),
as shown in Table 5. There were more patients who experi-
enced adverse events of muscle stiffness, muscle pain, and
muscle soreness in the TTM group compared with those in
the PT group. However, no significant difference between
the groups was found.
Table 4 compares patients’ assessments of their outcomes
by group. The number of patients in the TTM group who
reported that their feelings of spasticity had decreased was
greater than those who reported the same in the PT group
(79.2% versus 52.4%; P=0.057). However, the functions
of their limbs improved only 37%–38% with no difference
between the groups (P=0.967). Concerning patient satisfac-
tion, 90.5% of the patients were satisfied with the PT pro-
gram compared with 75% of the massage patients. Again,
there was no significant difference between the two groups
(P=0.427). The number of adverse events that occurred dur-
ing the study did not differ between the groups (P=0.807),
as shown in Table 5. There were more patients who experi-
enced adverse events of muscle stiffness, muscle pain, and
muscle soreness in the TTM group compared with those in
the PT group. However, no significant difference between
the groups was found.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..