Fig. 2. Predictors and patterns of decline. (a–g) Environmental surfaces utilized as proxies of the decline hypotheses: (a) DD VAR (pale gray: 3.32 d, black: 45.76 d); (b) DD
MEAN (pale gray: 0 d, black: 303.14 d); (c) T VAR (pale gray: 2.26 C, black: 7.76 C); (d) P VAR (pale gray:125.64 mm, black: 904.75 mm); (e) AG (pale gray: 0% of
agricultural surface, black: 100% of agricultural surface); (f) UR (pale gray: 0% of urban surface, black: 91.80% of urban surface); (g) IR (pale gray: 4.482 106 J/m2, black:
6.486 106 J/m2). See text for variable descriptions. (h) Percentage of declining species per cell (pale gray: 0% black: 100%). In all figures darkness of the pixels are
proportional to cell values.
Fig. 2. Predictors and patterns of decline. (a–g) Environmental surfaces utilized as proxies of the decline hypotheses: (a) DD VAR (pale gray: 3.32 d, black: 45.76 d); (b) DD
MEAN (pale gray: 0 d, black: 303.14 d); (c) T VAR (pale gray: 2.26 C, black: 7.76 C); (d) P VAR (pale gray:125.64 mm, black: 904.75 mm); (e) AG (pale gray: 0% of
agricultural surface, black: 100% of agricultural surface); (f) UR (pale gray: 0% of urban surface, black: 91.80% of urban surface); (g) IR (pale gray: 4.482 106 J/m2, black:
6.486 106 J/m2). See text for variable descriptions. (h) Percentage of declining species per cell (pale gray: 0% black: 100%). In all figures darkness of the pixels are
proportional to cell values.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
