Approximately 90% of alleles were called when using the
ParaDNA Intelligence Test and there was no significant difference
observed between control and treated samples for any of the blood,
semenorsalivasamples(Fig.2a).Thissuggeststhepresumptivetests
had no impact on the ability of the ParaDNA Intelligence Test to
provide a result. There was also no significant difference observed
between the control and treated fingerprint samples which was
mirroredwithtestsonthehightemplatesalivasamples(Fig.2b).The
impact of aluminium powder seen on the Screening Test was not
observed in the intelligence test. It is considered that this is possibly
due to the larger volume of enzyme associated with the latter test
increasing the test robustness and tolerance to inhibitors.