However, the assessment may reveal a fundamental deficit since it is impossible to reflect the empirical outputs of the program after the program has actually been undertaken.Deficiencies in understanding the effectiveness of the program impact may hinder identifying credible evaluation model. In addition, due to “the politics of the budgetary processes, 6” a preliminary feasibility study regarding whether to inject budgetary investments may stand against program outputs, particularly in agricultural and rural projects. In contrast, based on a retrospective design, ex-post evaluation can examine the actual program impact. By doing so, planners and policy-makers are able to draw more concrete conclusions that can be boiled down to developing better programs in the future.