่่Justice and Fairness
Pay and access to resources are critical concerns for most organizational actors.Not surprisingly;
rewards and resource allocation ;as well as actors"reactions to allocation decisions are therefore central topics in OB.research that sheds light on the processes by which organizational actors assess fairness;as well as the consequences of those assessments;is important for two reasons.
First;it presents a limitation to the traditional economic perspective of individuals as atomistic;
self-interested actors from a microperspective .In addition;it contrasts sharply with research on interpersonal decision making which focuses on individuals"egocentric preferences for maximizing their own utility relative to others.By placing the study of individual judgments in to the contexts in which people interact,we get deeper insight into socially situated decision-making processes.
Although OB is interested in the factors that affect our assessments of what is just,and the consequences of those judgments on organizational outcomes,it also goes beyond the individual level of analysis to consider the effects of social context on justice assessments,as well as the implication of those assessments for organizational systems.This literature therefore considers the effect of the perceiver"s relative position within the social system on this judgments.it also considers the implications of individual perceptions of fairness on the social system itself .We deal with both of these topics,paying special attention to the negative consequences of procedural justice assessments in the work place ,sabotage and revenge
่่Justice and Fairness
Pay and access to resources are critical concerns for most organizational actors.Not surprisingly;
rewards and resource allocation ;as well as actors"reactions to allocation decisions are therefore central topics in OB.research that sheds light on the processes by which organizational actors assess fairness;as well as the consequences of those assessments;is important for two reasons.
First;it presents a limitation to the traditional economic perspective of individuals as atomistic;
self-interested actors from a microperspective .In addition;it contrasts sharply with research on interpersonal decision making which focuses on individuals"egocentric preferences for maximizing their own utility relative to others.By placing the study of individual judgments in to the contexts in which people interact,we get deeper insight into socially situated decision-making processes.
Although OB is interested in the factors that affect our assessments of what is just,and the consequences of those judgments on organizational outcomes,it also goes beyond the individual level of analysis to consider the effects of social context on justice assessments,as well as the implication of those assessments for organizational systems.This literature therefore considers the effect of the perceiver"s relative position within the social system on this judgments.it also considers the implications of individual perceptions of fairness on the social system itself .We deal with both of these topics,paying special attention to the negative consequences of procedural justice assessments in the work place ,sabotage and revenge
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""