The labor force participation rate of naturalized citizens, for example, rose slightly from 83.7
to 84.3% in the more generous states, and was stable at 84.0% in the less generous states.
In contrast, the labor force participation rate of non-citizens rose from 84.4 to 86.9% in the
more generous states, but increased by 6 percentage points (from 82.5 to 88.5%) in the less
generous states. The descriptive evidence, therefore, clearly indicates that the immigrant men who could have been most adversely affected by welfare reform substantially increased
their labor supply
The labor force participation rate of naturalized citizens, for example, rose slightly from 83.7to 84.3% in the more generous states, and was stable at 84.0% in the less generous states.In contrast, the labor force participation rate of non-citizens rose from 84.4 to 86.9% in themore generous states, but increased by 6 percentage points (from 82.5 to 88.5%) in the lessgenerous states. The descriptive evidence, therefore, clearly indicates that the immigrant men who could have been most adversely affected by welfare reform substantially increasedtheir labor supply
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..