These are question that Derrida has achnowledged pertain to his work. First, one can look at the direct overlap between their argument. In Derrida's iuntranslate 1954 Memoire (master's thesis) he calls Thao's note on how the Husserlian understanding of time abstract the real world "remarkable," and he suggests that Thao expresses a new concept of the living present "very brilliantly," In Derrida's translation if Husserl's Origin of Geometry he chooses "production" as the best equivalent of Leistung, trem which Husserl employs to describe how truth is an achievement or performance. In preferring "production," Derrida's appears to rely on Thao's argument about the conditionality of this truth and its origin in fallible subjective perception. More broadly, a central tenet of Derrida's early critique of Husserl is an interrogation of the possibilities of determining original material condition, most noticeably in relation to the issue of language. Derrida brings to the fore Husserl's worries over to what extent language should be recognize as and ideal system of meaning and how it's material existence could affect that judgment. For instance: