Just want to remind you. I am waiting your answer about above mentioned subject. As Natural Palm Oil Industry who is another P&C client may not ready to be audited by the end of this year, we may have to convince UPOIC to work with you instead even though they have been certified by TUV NORD Integra last year for fulfillment of the accreditation required by ASI.
What do you mean with “even though they have been certified by TUV NORD Integra last year for fulfillment of the accreditation required by ASI.” I don’t understand. I meant that UPOIC was actually certified by TUV NORD Indonesia last year. The due date for surveillance audit #1 is set on December 2013 before their expiry date of etrace at the beginning of next year. As we have only one step left to get an accreditation from ASI, this would be good chance for us to fulfill in achievement of accreditation. So, we should do the witness audit with UPOIC
Is univanich also an option for the witness audit? Univanich is also an option but the due date for surveillance audit is around March 2014
How many clients do you have now for RSPO P&C? 2 clients who certified by us under TUV NORD Indonesia. 2 new clients who signed with us but don't ready for the audit by the end of this year. 3-4 clients who are not signed the contract yet but may accept our proposal later.
From this reason, we should keep the same proposal done prior with TN Integra as the one of proposal term especially costs. Otherwise the client may decided to not transfer from TUV NORD Indonesia to Integra. Please also inform me the relevant steps that should be taken to win this proposal.
Which proposal do you talk about? what proposal I referred is the proposal to convince UPOIC to change their certificate given by TUV NORD Indonesia to TUV NORD Integra instead. We have to convince them to terminate the contract done with TUV NORD Indonesia
What do you mean with “to win this proposal” To success in convincing the UPOIC for working with TUV NORD Integra instead