Newman's critical comparison of HCI and traditional engineering papers [12] found that the engineering papers were mostly incremental (improved model, improved technique), whereas many of the HCI papers broke new ground (observations preliminary to a model, brand new technique). One reasonable interpretation is that the traditional engineering disciplines are much more mature than HCI, and so the character of the research might reasonably differ [17, 18]. Also, it appears that different disciplines have different expectations about the "size" of a research result—the extent to which it builds on existing knowledge or opens new questions. In the case of ICSE, the kinds of questions that are of interest and the minimum
interesting increment may differ from one area to another.
Newman's critical comparison of HCI and traditional engineering papers [12] found that the engineering papers were mostly incremental (improved model, improved technique), whereas many of the HCI papers broke new ground (observations preliminary to a model, brand new technique). One reasonable interpretation is that the traditional engineering disciplines are much more mature than HCI, and so the character of the research might reasonably differ [17, 18]. Also, it appears that different disciplines have different expectations about the "size" of a research result—the extent to which it builds on existing knowledge or opens new questions. In the case of ICSE, the kinds of questions that are of interest and the minimuminteresting increment may differ from one area to another.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
