Abstract
This study investigates whether antigenic evolution within H1N1 swine influenza viruses can compromise vaccine efficacy and, specifically, whether the A/New Jersey/8/76 strain in the commercial swine influenza vaccines needs to be updated. Pigs were vaccinated twice intramuscularly with experimental monovalent vaccines derived from different H1N1 strains (A/New Jersey/8/76, Sw/Belgium/1/83 or Sw/Belgium/1/98) or with a commercial bivalent vaccine based on A/New Jersey/8/76 (H1N1) and A/Port Chalmers/1/73 (H3N2). Experimental and commercial vaccines contained a different adjuvant. Two weeks after the second vaccination, all pigs were challenged intratracheally with Sw/Belgium/1/98. Mean pre-challenge haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titres against the challenge virus were lower for the experimental A/New Jersey/8/76 vaccine than for the other vaccines. The reduction in mean virus titres in the lungs was highly significant for the latter vaccines, including the commercial New Jersey-derived vaccine, but not for the experimental A/New Jersey/8/76 vaccine. Clinical signs after challenge were negligible in all vaccinates. Post-challenge levels of interferon-α and tumor necrosis factor-α in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were reduced in the vaccinates, while levels of interleukin-1 and neutrophils were less consistent. Though the A/New Jersey/8/76 strain is less effective in preventing infection by Sw/Belgium/1/98 than the homologous virus or than Sw/Belgium/1/83, all strains can protect completely if antibody titres against the challenge virus are sufficiently high. Apart from the vaccine strain, adjuvant and antigenic dose may play a crucial role in vaccine efficacy.
Keywords
H1N1 swine influenza virus;
Vaccines;
Antigenic evolution;
Protection;
Cytokines
AbstractThis study investigates whether antigenic evolution within H1N1 swine influenza viruses can compromise vaccine efficacy and, specifically, whether the A/New Jersey/8/76 strain in the commercial swine influenza vaccines needs to be updated. Pigs were vaccinated twice intramuscularly with experimental monovalent vaccines derived from different H1N1 strains (A/New Jersey/8/76, Sw/Belgium/1/83 or Sw/Belgium/1/98) or with a commercial bivalent vaccine based on A/New Jersey/8/76 (H1N1) and A/Port Chalmers/1/73 (H3N2). Experimental and commercial vaccines contained a different adjuvant. Two weeks after the second vaccination, all pigs were challenged intratracheally with Sw/Belgium/1/98. Mean pre-challenge haemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titres against the challenge virus were lower for the experimental A/New Jersey/8/76 vaccine than for the other vaccines. The reduction in mean virus titres in the lungs was highly significant for the latter vaccines, including the commercial New Jersey-derived vaccine, but not for the experimental A/New Jersey/8/76 vaccine. Clinical signs after challenge were negligible in all vaccinates. Post-challenge levels of interferon-α and tumor necrosis factor-α in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were reduced in the vaccinates, while levels of interleukin-1 and neutrophils were less consistent. Though the A/New Jersey/8/76 strain is less effective in preventing infection by Sw/Belgium/1/98 than the homologous virus or than Sw/Belgium/1/83, all strains can protect completely if antibody titres against the challenge virus are sufficiently high. Apart from the vaccine strain, adjuvant and antigenic dose may play a crucial role in vaccine efficacy.KeywordsH1N1 swine influenza virus; Vaccines; Antigenic evolution; Protection; Cytokines
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..