employed a sample of 968 firms from a variety of industries with an average size of 4,412 employees. Thirteen human resource practices were used by Huselid (1995) to represent the domain of high performance work practices. The human resource practices were factor analyzed and two factors emerged. The first factor was named employee skills and organizational structures. This factor included job design, selection, training, and quality of work life human resource practices. The second factor was named employee motivation and included the human resource practices of formal appraisals, compensation, employee merit, and promotion decisions (Huselid, 1995). Huselid (1995) examined the relationship between bundles of high performance work practices and firm performance and the relationships between bundles of high performance work practices and individual performance and turnover. The findings by Huselid (1995) indicate that high performance work practices positively influence employee performance and reduce employee turnover. Also, high performance work practices were positively related to organization performance